lottery reconciliation software
Lottery reconciliation with records behind every gap.

Who this is for
Convenience and fuel retailers selling lottery products in supported pilot jurisdictions.
Why the current workflow breaks.
Counts and settlements use different clocks
A book activation, ticket sale and settlement can fall in different reporting periods. Align those definitions before treating a difference as shrink.
Start with a job worth paying for
Name the buyer, measure the current effort and choose a result that can be checked against source records. A paid pilot should answer whether the workflow creates enough value to repeat.
The workflow
From the first record to the next action.
Agree on the records, owner rules and completed output. Validate the workflow with your stores before expanding.
- 01
Confirm the records
Book activations, opening and closing counts, sales and lottery settlement reports. Validate access, completeness and the reporting period.
- 02
Agree the operating rules
Define approval limits, responsibilities and the point at which an unresolved issue is escalated.
- 03
Run the job
Identify the gap, request missing records and assign an investigation with an outcome.
- 04
Review and expand
Measure unexplained ticket differences and exceptions resolved with evidence. Compare with the baseline and total delivery cost before expanding.
Who uses this, and how.
One store or a small group
Start with a recurring task and the person responsible for it. Keep the first scope small enough to measure.
A regional or international network
Use representative sites and validate local systems, currency, language and reporting requirements before rollout.
Side by side
StationPro vs. the current manual handoff.
| Dimension | StationPro | The current manual handoff |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence | Source records stay with the scoped workflow | Confirm how records are collected and retained today |
| Responsibility | A named person and an agreed next step | Identify who currently owns follow-up |
| Value | A measured pilot outcome against its delivery cost | Record the current time, cost and unresolved work |
Questions, answered.
Does a ticket gap identify theft?
No. Review timing, missing records, counting and operational errors first. A variance alone does not establish misconduct.
What records should we bring?
Book activations, opening and closing counts, sales and lottery settlement reports. Use representative samples with sensitive information removed for the initial review.
What will the pilot measure?
Unexplained ticket differences and exceptions resolved with evidence. Agree on the baseline, duration, price and responsible reviewer before starting.
Keep reading.
Related features
Tools and templates
From the blog
Loss attribution beats theft prevention.
Why the goal isn't to stop shrinkage at an independent station, it's to know who, when, and how. A field guide to building an attribution system instead of a security one.
The lottery shrinkage playbook.
How to instrument scratcher accountability across barcode scanning, serial-gap detection, and shift attribution. The four-week sprint that closes the leak.
Start with the job that matters most.
Choose one job, agree the fee and check the finished work. Start with a scoped paid sprint and expand when the results earn it.
